release BEFORE the current release, it's at:
http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/shullfish/story/sorenson_360_video_server_service/
On Dec 7, 2009, at 2:54 PM, Steve Hullfish wrote:
> I've got the latest version of Squeeze. There's a lot of cool stuff
> implemented in it. It looks better and is faster than Squeeze 5. I
> think there are plenty of presets. The product is pretty radically
> different than it was three or four years ago. They have done some
> stuff with what they call "publishing" which is pretty interesting as
> far as workflow is concerned and it has batching features too. You can
> set up watch folders and have stuff automatically uploaded to an ftp
> site of your choice at the end of an encode with an email that goes
> out to a client at the end of the upload. Completely unsupervised.
>
> I did a review of the last version of Squeeze before the current
> version. THe current version is 6 and I reviewed 5.5. 6 has some more
> cool stuff than 5.5, but 5.5 is closer to where they are now than
> probably when you last saw them "many years ago." I'd definitely
> suggest you give them another look.
>
> I occasionally use Compressor still, but only when I want a specific
> preset that I know I can just drop on in Compressor.
>
> On Dec 7, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Patrick Inhofer wrote:
>
>> Has anyone used the lastest version of Squeeze?
>>
>> They seem to have integrated a Review and Approve process into their
>> toolset.
>>
>> We migrated off Squeeze many years ago onto what became Episode Pro
>> (Telestream bought it, re-branded it, and massively spiked the price
>> on it). I like batch management on it. The large number of presets
>> and
>> intuitive interface make it easier to use than Compressor.
>>
>> FWIW, I've started using BitVice again for HD -> MPEG-2 NTSC/PAL DVDs
>> - especially for my RED clients who hate what Compressor does to
>> their
>> footage on standard def DVDs.
>>
>> - pi
>>
>> - -
>> Patrick inhofer
>> Finisher-in-Chief
>> Fini
>> http://fini.tv/demo.html
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 2:37 AM, stuart rankin wrote:
>>
>>> At Cartoon Network Asia Pacific, we use both - Squeeze is ok -
>>> confined to Avid suites. Episode on FCP. I find Episode easier to
>>> work with. Plus, the main reason I got it, I can batch
>>> process .mxf files. It does a decent job of transcoding etc.
>>> Interface is nicer - to me. It's from Telestream so has great track
>>> record.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------
To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment