Friday, December 11, 2009

Re: OT:Re: [FCP-L] OT: How did they do "digital effects" in the analouge era?

I was a CMX guy as well. Got the framed certificate in a box somewhere.
I even got an original manual for the Ampex ACE editor.
My PM hated the GVG-131 but I found it kinda easy, didn't even RTFM.
Did the TD/edit controller thing as well. MY PM told me that it was
the wave of the future :>)


Richard Mills
Cinematography-Photography-Editor
Phoenix, AZ
480-840-1388 (h)
480-522-8788 (c)

On Dec 11, 2009, at 7:53 PM, johnrobmoore wrote:

> Hey I was CMX then ISC/Grass/Editware but the Calloway worked very
> much like it's predecessors. Heck they all came from CMX around
> that time. ET was using Calloways and I had many from there camp on
> staff. This was just when the first GVG-131's were out at a bargin
> of 13K for a three machine rig. Oh and the scratch and sniff jog
> pad. Don't miss that but I do miss the original ISC jog wheel, the
> latter bigger wheel with center touch jog was okay but the years of
> the scratch and sniff were painful. We had one of the first
> GVG-141's at Glendale Studios but they couldn't get it to work so
> they gave us a 41 which was more solid. The switcher was a 300 one
> of the first units and it had come from the Osmond studios in Utah.
> It didn't even have effects dissolve. They modified nearly
> everything but the ME pushbuttons to get it to work with the
> editor. Mighty sweet room when we got done. I TD'd and edited
> pilots right from the control room. No need for post just let me
> grab the edit controller and pick up from the last roll in bang
> when your done your done.
>
> --- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, Richard Mills
> <phxpicsnapper@...> wrote:
> >
> > Calloway edit controllers,
> > NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! :>0
> >
> > Richard Mills
> > Cinematography-Photography-Editor
> > Phoenix, AZ
> > 480-840-1388 (h)
> > 480-522-8788 (c)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 11, 2009, at 1:53 PM, johnrobmoore wrote:
> >
> > > Small world I inherited some of those Sony 910 bays when I was an
> > > editor/post supervisor on the Dom Deluise version of Candid Camera
> > > in the early 90's. First thing I did was get Calloway edit
> > > controlers to replace the 910's. The LA Unitel facility took care
> > > of the maintenance. Nothing like a good hicon reel for wacky wipes
> > > my favorite was the school of fish. Create the body with an oval,
> > > tail with a wedge wipe, modulate the wedge to get tail swimming
> > > motion. Add an eye if you dare. A-53 multipix with warp for wavey
> > > motion and slide the school in source space to move them accross
> > > the screen. Damn I think I'm breaking out in tears. Where's a good
> > > fish wipe when you need one today?
> > >
> > > --- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, "mhollis55" <mhollis55@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > John, we must be the old foagies here.
> > > >
> > > > The first real 3D page turn I used was the Abekas A53D, which I
> > > used at Inside Edition. We also used it to do box turns and other
> > > transitions, as well as key effects and certain posterize,
> polarize
> > > effects. But I blew away the other editors at Inside when I used a
> > > 3/4" machine, rolling in tandem (on a Sony 910 editor) to generate
> > > really fancy wipes (that I had a friend lay off for me, white to
> > > black, then reverse from a GVG 200 switcher) using the keyer on a
> > > Grass 110 switcher. These additional wipes really impressed my co-
> > > workers, as they thought I was using the Abekas to do that.
> > > >
> > > > One of my favorite moves was to do a stretch transition,
> > > stretching a frame longitudinally or vertically as I pushed the
> > > video to the incoming picture. I invented that move (for the
> > > workgroup I was in) on the Abekas. I saw my transition ideas
> > > repeated there for years after I left.
> > > >
> > > > I then learned the ADO which did need some really odd numbers in
> > > order to do a page turn. Happily, those who developed the page
> turn
> > > didn't think that they needed anyone to actually pay for their
> work
> > > and the disk with the effect tended to come with the ADO. The next
> > > digital effect box I used was the Grass Valley Kaleidoscope which
> > > was horrendously expensive. It would do a 3D page peel with a
> front
> > > and a back and a shadow if there were enough channels. Each
> channel
> > > of Kaleidoscope cost a quarter million dollars, so to make a cube
> > > in one pass (desirable in the day of the analog 1" machine with no
> > > pre-read) one had to drop at least $1.25 million (an additional
> > > quarter million for a "combiner").
> > > >
> > > > Edit rooms were "á la carte." Generally you'd get 3 VTRs at the
> > > room rate, and then an extra $100 per hour was charged for each
> > > channel of digital effects, each machine added and, perhaps an
> > > additional $75 per hour for character generation. The highest
> > > hourly rate I billed was $1275.00, which I did for three weeks of
> > > eight-hour days. My employer was very, very happy, as that client
> > > literally paid for another digital effect device.
> > > >
> > > > Today, we look at render time. And we grumble when effects
> take a
> > > long time to render. Back in the linear world, everything was real
> > > time, so when you laid it down to tape, it was done. Rendered. And
> > > you could look at the full effect as you were building layers (I
> > > suppose that kind of workflow is available in Motion these
> days, as
> > > you can add effects while you are rolling through your timeline,
> > > but VTRs never dropped frames).
> > > >
> > > > But, when you think about it, everything done to video is a
> > > "digital effect" nowadays. A dissolve is a digitally-produced
> > > transition on a pixel-by-pixel level. Switchers did that by
> using a
> > > key ramp from one source to another, controlled by a timed
> > > transition button or a fader bar.
> > > >
> > > > --- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, John Heiser <jpheiser@>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > There was a number hack in ADO for creating a page turn which
> > > appeared to
> > > > > twist the page as it moved off the screen, but the original
> ADO
> > > didn't
> > > > > actually do curved surfaces. Quantel was nice but out of reach
> > > financially
> > > > > for a lot of operations. Abekas A53D had a nice page roll and,
> > > with a
> > > > > combiner for multiple channels, you could do it in one pass.
> > > Otherwise, you
> > > > > would lay off your backside pass over superblack to tape
> > > machine, and key
> > > > > that along with the frontside.
> > > > >
> > > > > ----
> > > > > John Heiser
> > > > > o2ideas
> > > > > birmingham, alabama, USA
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Marilyn Heiss <mdivah@>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As far as I know--and I am one of the editors of "mature"
> > > vintage on
> > > > > > this list -- it was a Quantel product that had the first
> page
> > > turns
> > > > > > for tape post. It might have been the Quantel 5000, or maybe
> > > page
> > > > > > turns came in with the Mirage, which is the box that brought
> > > in the
> > > > > > shattering glass effect, among others. I know the first
> > > Quantel boxes
> > > > > > that came into our edit suites at NBC NY were 2D, then one
> > > suite got
> > > > > > the multi-channel Quantel and another got the Mirage. When
> > > ADO came
> > > > > > into the picture in all suites, page turns became the
> > > transition of
> > > > > > choice among many producers--they wanted to use them for
> > > everything....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I cut a lot of news pieces on economic issues--lots of words
> > > with
> > > > > > little video and a lot of graphic representations--in a
> > > linear room
> > > > > > using a Grass Valley 1600 switcher and a one-channel 2D
> > > Quantel. So
> > > > > > many passes, so many hours to put together something
> that, as
> > > you say,
> > > > > > is now much simpler.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Marilyn
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Dec 10, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Sune Alexandersen wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi group!
> > > > > > > I'm watching an old Norwegian tv-serie made in 1979 and
> the
> > > opening
> > > > > > > title made me think: how on earth did they achieve the
> page-
> > > turn
> > > > > > > transition before.. Eh... Fcp/Avid.. Everything!!
> > > > > > > They used a lot of effects in the good old days that is a
> > > simple drag
> > > > > > > and drop operation these days..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hope some of you with the proper mileage could shed some
> > > light on the
> > > > > > > issue!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards from rainy Norway,
> > > > > > > Sune Alexandersen
> > > > > > > Sent whilst on the go!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo!
> Groups Links
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

OT:Re: [FCP-L] OT: How did they do "digital effects" in the analouge era?

Hey I was CMX then ISC/Grass/Editware but the Calloway worked very much like it's predecessors. Heck they all came from CMX around that time. ET was using Calloways and I had many from there camp on staff. This was just when the first GVG-131's were out at a bargin of 13K for a three machine rig. Oh and the scratch and sniff jog pad. Don't miss that but I do miss the original ISC jog wheel, the latter bigger wheel with center touch jog was okay but the years of the scratch and sniff were painful. We had one of the first GVG-141's at Glendale Studios but they couldn't get it to work so they gave us a 41 which was more solid. The switcher was a 300 one of the first units and it had come from the Osmond studios in Utah. It didn't even have effects dissolve. They modified nearly everything but the ME pushbuttons to get it to work with the editor. Mighty sweet room when we got done. I TD'd and edited pilots right from the control room. No need for post just let me grab the edit controller and pick up from the last roll in bang when your done your done.

--- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, Richard Mills <phxpicsnapper@...> wrote:
>
> Calloway edit controllers,
> NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! :>0
>
> Richard Mills
> Cinematography-Photography-Editor
> Phoenix, AZ
> 480-840-1388 (h)
> 480-522-8788 (c)
>
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 11, 2009, at 1:53 PM, johnrobmoore wrote:
>
> > Small world I inherited some of those Sony 910 bays when I was an
> > editor/post supervisor on the Dom Deluise version of Candid Camera
> > in the early 90's. First thing I did was get Calloway edit
> > controlers to replace the 910's. The LA Unitel facility took care
> > of the maintenance. Nothing like a good hicon reel for wacky wipes
> > my favorite was the school of fish. Create the body with an oval,
> > tail with a wedge wipe, modulate the wedge to get tail swimming
> > motion. Add an eye if you dare. A-53 multipix with warp for wavey
> > motion and slide the school in source space to move them accross
> > the screen. Damn I think I'm breaking out in tears. Where's a good
> > fish wipe when you need one today?
> >
> > --- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, "mhollis55" <mhollis55@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > John, we must be the old foagies here.
> > >
> > > The first real 3D page turn I used was the Abekas A53D, which I
> > used at Inside Edition. We also used it to do box turns and other
> > transitions, as well as key effects and certain posterize, polarize
> > effects. But I blew away the other editors at Inside when I used a
> > 3/4" machine, rolling in tandem (on a Sony 910 editor) to generate
> > really fancy wipes (that I had a friend lay off for me, white to
> > black, then reverse from a GVG 200 switcher) using the keyer on a
> > Grass 110 switcher. These additional wipes really impressed my co-
> > workers, as they thought I was using the Abekas to do that.
> > >
> > > One of my favorite moves was to do a stretch transition,
> > stretching a frame longitudinally or vertically as I pushed the
> > video to the incoming picture. I invented that move (for the
> > workgroup I was in) on the Abekas. I saw my transition ideas
> > repeated there for years after I left.
> > >
> > > I then learned the ADO which did need some really odd numbers in
> > order to do a page turn. Happily, those who developed the page turn
> > didn't think that they needed anyone to actually pay for their work
> > and the disk with the effect tended to come with the ADO. The next
> > digital effect box I used was the Grass Valley Kaleidoscope which
> > was horrendously expensive. It would do a 3D page peel with a front
> > and a back and a shadow if there were enough channels. Each channel
> > of Kaleidoscope cost a quarter million dollars, so to make a cube
> > in one pass (desirable in the day of the analog 1" machine with no
> > pre-read) one had to drop at least $1.25 million (an additional
> > quarter million for a "combiner").
> > >
> > > Edit rooms were "á la carte." Generally you'd get 3 VTRs at the
> > room rate, and then an extra $100 per hour was charged for each
> > channel of digital effects, each machine added and, perhaps an
> > additional $75 per hour for character generation. The highest
> > hourly rate I billed was $1275.00, which I did for three weeks of
> > eight-hour days. My employer was very, very happy, as that client
> > literally paid for another digital effect device.
> > >
> > > Today, we look at render time. And we grumble when effects take a
> > long time to render. Back in the linear world, everything was real
> > time, so when you laid it down to tape, it was done. Rendered. And
> > you could look at the full effect as you were building layers (I
> > suppose that kind of workflow is available in Motion these days, as
> > you can add effects while you are rolling through your timeline,
> > but VTRs never dropped frames).
> > >
> > > But, when you think about it, everything done to video is a
> > "digital effect" nowadays. A dissolve is a digitally-produced
> > transition on a pixel-by-pixel level. Switchers did that by using a
> > key ramp from one source to another, controlled by a timed
> > transition button or a fader bar.
> > >
> > > --- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, John Heiser <jpheiser@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There was a number hack in ADO for creating a page turn which
> > appeared to
> > > > twist the page as it moved off the screen, but the original ADO
> > didn't
> > > > actually do curved surfaces. Quantel was nice but out of reach
> > financially
> > > > for a lot of operations. Abekas A53D had a nice page roll and,
> > with a
> > > > combiner for multiple channels, you could do it in one pass.
> > Otherwise, you
> > > > would lay off your backside pass over superblack to tape
> > machine, and key
> > > > that along with the frontside.
> > > >
> > > > ----
> > > > John Heiser
> > > > o2ideas
> > > > birmingham, alabama, USA
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Marilyn Heiss <mdivah@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > As far as I know--and I am one of the editors of "mature"
> > vintage on
> > > > > this list -- it was a Quantel product that had the first page
> > turns
> > > > > for tape post. It might have been the Quantel 5000, or maybe
> > page
> > > > > turns came in with the Mirage, which is the box that brought
> > in the
> > > > > shattering glass effect, among others. I know the first
> > Quantel boxes
> > > > > that came into our edit suites at NBC NY were 2D, then one
> > suite got
> > > > > the multi-channel Quantel and another got the Mirage. When
> > ADO came
> > > > > into the picture in all suites, page turns became the
> > transition of
> > > > > choice among many producers--they wanted to use them for
> > everything....
> > > > >
> > > > > I cut a lot of news pieces on economic issues--lots of words
> > with
> > > > > little video and a lot of graphic representations--in a
> > linear room
> > > > > using a Grass Valley 1600 switcher and a one-channel 2D
> > Quantel. So
> > > > > many passes, so many hours to put together something that, as
> > you say,
> > > > > is now much simpler.
> > > > >
> > > > > Marilyn
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Dec 10, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Sune Alexandersen wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi group!
> > > > > > I'm watching an old Norwegian tv-serie made in 1979 and the
> > opening
> > > > > > title made me think: how on earth did they achieve the page-
> > turn
> > > > > > transition before.. Eh... Fcp/Avid.. Everything!!
> > > > > > They used a lot of effects in the good old days that is a
> > simple drag
> > > > > > and drop operation these days..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hope some of you with the proper mileage could shed some
> > light on the
> > > > > > issue!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards from rainy Norway,
> > > > > > Sune Alexandersen
> > > > > > Sent whilst on the go!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: OT:Re: [FCP-L] OT: How did they do "digital effects" in the analouge era?

Calloway edit controllers,
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! :>0

Richard Mills
Cinematography-Photography-Editor
Phoenix, AZ
480-840-1388 (h)
480-522-8788 (c)

On Dec 11, 2009, at 1:53 PM, johnrobmoore wrote:

> Small world I inherited some of those Sony 910 bays when I was an
> editor/post supervisor on the Dom Deluise version of Candid Camera
> in the early 90's. First thing I did was get Calloway edit
> controlers to replace the 910's. The LA Unitel facility took care
> of the maintenance. Nothing like a good hicon reel for wacky wipes
> my favorite was the school of fish. Create the body with an oval,
> tail with a wedge wipe, modulate the wedge to get tail swimming
> motion. Add an eye if you dare. A-53 multipix with warp for wavey
> motion and slide the school in source space to move them accross
> the screen. Damn I think I'm breaking out in tears. Where's a good
> fish wipe when you need one today?
>
> --- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, "mhollis55" <mhollis55@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > John, we must be the old foagies here.
> >
> > The first real 3D page turn I used was the Abekas A53D, which I
> used at Inside Edition. We also used it to do box turns and other
> transitions, as well as key effects and certain posterize, polarize
> effects. But I blew away the other editors at Inside when I used a
> 3/4" machine, rolling in tandem (on a Sony 910 editor) to generate
> really fancy wipes (that I had a friend lay off for me, white to
> black, then reverse from a GVG 200 switcher) using the keyer on a
> Grass 110 switcher. These additional wipes really impressed my co-
> workers, as they thought I was using the Abekas to do that.
> >
> > One of my favorite moves was to do a stretch transition,
> stretching a frame longitudinally or vertically as I pushed the
> video to the incoming picture. I invented that move (for the
> workgroup I was in) on the Abekas. I saw my transition ideas
> repeated there for years after I left.
> >
> > I then learned the ADO which did need some really odd numbers in
> order to do a page turn. Happily, those who developed the page turn
> didn't think that they needed anyone to actually pay for their work
> and the disk with the effect tended to come with the ADO. The next
> digital effect box I used was the Grass Valley Kaleidoscope which
> was horrendously expensive. It would do a 3D page peel with a front
> and a back and a shadow if there were enough channels. Each channel
> of Kaleidoscope cost a quarter million dollars, so to make a cube
> in one pass (desirable in the day of the analog 1" machine with no
> pre-read) one had to drop at least $1.25 million (an additional
> quarter million for a "combiner").
> >
> > Edit rooms were "á la carte." Generally you'd get 3 VTRs at the
> room rate, and then an extra $100 per hour was charged for each
> channel of digital effects, each machine added and, perhaps an
> additional $75 per hour for character generation. The highest
> hourly rate I billed was $1275.00, which I did for three weeks of
> eight-hour days. My employer was very, very happy, as that client
> literally paid for another digital effect device.
> >
> > Today, we look at render time. And we grumble when effects take a
> long time to render. Back in the linear world, everything was real
> time, so when you laid it down to tape, it was done. Rendered. And
> you could look at the full effect as you were building layers (I
> suppose that kind of workflow is available in Motion these days, as
> you can add effects while you are rolling through your timeline,
> but VTRs never dropped frames).
> >
> > But, when you think about it, everything done to video is a
> "digital effect" nowadays. A dissolve is a digitally-produced
> transition on a pixel-by-pixel level. Switchers did that by using a
> key ramp from one source to another, controlled by a timed
> transition button or a fader bar.
> >
> > --- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, John Heiser <jpheiser@> wrote:
> > >
> > > There was a number hack in ADO for creating a page turn which
> appeared to
> > > twist the page as it moved off the screen, but the original ADO
> didn't
> > > actually do curved surfaces. Quantel was nice but out of reach
> financially
> > > for a lot of operations. Abekas A53D had a nice page roll and,
> with a
> > > combiner for multiple channels, you could do it in one pass.
> Otherwise, you
> > > would lay off your backside pass over superblack to tape
> machine, and key
> > > that along with the frontside.
> > >
> > > ----
> > > John Heiser
> > > o2ideas
> > > birmingham, alabama, USA
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Marilyn Heiss <mdivah@> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > As far as I know--and I am one of the editors of "mature"
> vintage on
> > > > this list -- it was a Quantel product that had the first page
> turns
> > > > for tape post. It might have been the Quantel 5000, or maybe
> page
> > > > turns came in with the Mirage, which is the box that brought
> in the
> > > > shattering glass effect, among others. I know the first
> Quantel boxes
> > > > that came into our edit suites at NBC NY were 2D, then one
> suite got
> > > > the multi-channel Quantel and another got the Mirage. When
> ADO came
> > > > into the picture in all suites, page turns became the
> transition of
> > > > choice among many producers--they wanted to use them for
> everything....
> > > >
> > > > I cut a lot of news pieces on economic issues--lots of words
> with
> > > > little video and a lot of graphic representations--in a
> linear room
> > > > using a Grass Valley 1600 switcher and a one-channel 2D
> Quantel. So
> > > > many passes, so many hours to put together something that, as
> you say,
> > > > is now much simpler.
> > > >
> > > > Marilyn
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 10, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Sune Alexandersen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi group!
> > > > > I'm watching an old Norwegian tv-serie made in 1979 and the
> opening
> > > > > title made me think: how on earth did they achieve the page-
> turn
> > > > > transition before.. Eh... Fcp/Avid.. Everything!!
> > > > > They used a lot of effects in the good old days that is a
> simple drag
> > > > > and drop operation these days..
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope some of you with the proper mileage could shed some
> light on the
> > > > > issue!
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards from rainy Norway,
> > > > > Sune Alexandersen
> > > > > Sent whilst on the go!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] OT: How did they do "digital effects" in the analouge era?

Work tape. Bounce it back and forth between the machines and pray
for no generation loss :>)
That is how we used to do it.

Richard Mills
Cinematography-Photography-Editor
Phoenix, AZ
480-840-1388 (h)
480-522-8788 (c)

On Dec 10, 2009, at 3:33 PM, johnrobmoore wrote:

> I can remember they took a white card and a blue card and did a
> peel between the two. With a chroma key you could fudge a page turn
> even though it was really a wipe. I can't for the life of me
> remember how we did it with only two source machines. This was a
> 3/4 to 1 inch bay so no preread on the horizon for many years.
>
> --- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, Curtis Nichols
> <curtisnpcs@...> wrote:
> >
> > I had the Grass Valley "DVE" linked to the GV100 switcher.
> Combining a diagonal move with a diagonal wipe gave a really cheap
> page turn look.
> >
> > Curtis Nichols
> > Señor Editor
> > PCS Production Co.
> > Irving, Tx.
> > ------------------
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] OT: How did they do "digital effects" in the analouge era?

Late to the party on this. But the original Abekas A-53 didn't come
standard with the page peel. Had to order the optional Warp Board to
do that. The A-53 D had the page peel standard. The warp board was
a $45k Option on the original A-53. Gosh I miss the 1680
switcher :>) Ahhhh, memories...

Richard Mills
Cinematography-Photography-Editor
Phoenix, AZ
480-840-1388 (h)
480-522-8788 (c)

On Dec 10, 2009, at 2:32 PM, johnrobmoore wrote:

> Oh no the original ADO 3000 did not do a page turn. That was the
> big cool thing on the Abekas A-53 although it took two channels
> front and back and the combiner if you wanted to bring it in as a
> single source, or you could do two keys on the switcher maintaining
> priority of back over front. I never used the latter ADO 2000 and
> 1000 perhaps they added that feature. For the ADO you could put in
> some magic numbers with excessive perspective and get a page bend/
> twist but they were not very fun to modify. Who remembers the good
> ole "Shwip Shwap" move on the coveted ADO magic moves disk. Took me
> a year before I found the right story to use it on. Midnight
> Aerobics just needed that extra something the shwip shwap
> delivered. All that video goodness for only $180,000 per channel
> combiner not included. The 5 volt 200 amp power supply weighed as
> much as my 66 VW bug.
>
> --- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, Donnie Rogers <donnie@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Do a google for Ampex ADO, or Grass Valley Kaleidoscope.
> > And a room full of videotape machines.
> >
> >
> > Donnie Rogers
> > VP of Technology
> > Grass Roots Media, Inc.
> > 574-289-8437 Office
> > 574-250-0155 Mobile
> > donnie@...
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Tom Wolsky wrote:
> >
> > > There has a page peel on most linear switchers for years.
> > >
> > > All the best,
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > > On Dec 10, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Sune Alexandersen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi group!
> > > > I'm watching an old Norwegian tv-serie made in 1979 and the
> opening
> > > > title made me think: how on earth did they achieve the page-turn
> > > > transition before.. Eh... Fcp/Avid.. Everything!!
> > > > They used a lot of effects in the good old days that is a simple
> > > drag
> > > > and drop operation these days..
> > > >
> > > > Hope some of you with the proper mileage could shed some
> light on
> > > the
> > > > issue!
> > > >
> > > > Regards from rainy Norway,
> > > > Sune Alexandersen
> > > > Sent whilst on the go!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[FCP-L] OL 24 LIVE

Rod Charters is DP of the very successful TV series 24.
He made history this week by twittering live from the set during
production, using his iPhone and a FREE application called
"UstreamLive broadcaster". The pictures you are seeing are heavily
compressed by Ustream, but never the less, amazing stuff, the voice
you hear is Rod Charters.

In this first grab he talks with Sound Recordist Bill Goki who has won
two Emmys for his sound on 24
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/2941223

Other examples from the set can be found at http://www.ustream.tv/channel/24-onset

This just in http://tiny.cc/NvAa3

You can follow Rod on Twitter @rodneykiwi, yep he is from New Zealand.
When he is about to go live he sends out a Tweet, you can also Tweet
question to him.


Colortape Productions
222a Bay Street
PORT MELBOURNE, VICTORIA 3207
AUSTRALIA
+61 3 9580 5098
m 0418 327 082
Skype idwctp

IAN WILSON


http://twitter.com/wilsonid

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: OT:Re: [FCP-L] OT: How did they do "digital effects" in the analouge era?

Wow! You worked on the muppet show! I tip my hat to you, we still
watch that show in my family.

Cheers,

Darren


On Dec 11, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Stable Recordings wrote:

> You young lads!
>
> And when you got more than 4 or 5 layers (as we'd call them now) on a
> Quad tape, you could tell which were the oldest just by looking at
> them.
>
> Though the Muppet show audience shot had 7 layers, but careful use of
> equipment made the complete assembly only 3rd generation. Three
> machines and a studio.
>
> The banding wasn't too bad, but after the main edit and a standards
> conversion to NTSC, the pictures were, how shall I put it, a little
> noisy in places.
>
> Alison
>
> On Dec 11 2009, at 21:13, Steve Hullfish wrote:
>
> > Geez, who let the old guys onto the free computers down at the
> senior
> > center? :-)
> >
> > - from a fellow old guy who always knew how to get the most of his
> > 1" ... machine!
> >
> > On Dec 11, 2009, at 2:53 PM, johnrobmoore wrote:
> >
> >> Small world I inherited some of those Sony 910 bays when I was an
> >> editor/post supervisor on the Dom Deluise version of Candid Camera
> >> in the early 90's.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] How do I get better keying results in FCP?

I downloaded the latest versions of some keyers today from Toolfarm.
The shot was a well lit woman with some frizz and curls that I wanted
to keep.

For me, the fastest, easiest and best looking key was Keylight $250
node locked. One click and a couple of tweaks, looks great. I can see
individual hairs.

Followed by Digital Film Tools' zMatte v3 for FCP $375. I like this
one because of the built in light wrap. Slower to render though.

And then Red Giant's Primatte Pro $474. A little more work and slower
to render.

I also tried the FCP Keyer in FCP 7 and the stock Primatte RT keyer. I
almost couldn't pull the key I needed with either of these keyers
without using something like Key Correct Pro.

Benny Christensen
Producers Playhouse
Oklahoma City
405-858-0700

"One of the few good things about modern times: If you die horribly on
television, you will not have died in vain. You will have entertained
us." - Kurt Vonnegut (Cold Turkey)

On Dec 11, 2009, at 2:39 PM, johnrobmoore wrote:

> Let me rephrase the question. In my experience the Ultimatte keyer
> takes a much longer time to render than other keyers on the same
> system. My experience is mostly Avid and there is no question the
> Ultimatte guys do a really good job in this department but I was
> spoiled by the days of the meridian symphony which had an ultimatte
> chip and was not a render hog. So how does the render time on an AE
> or FCP system compare with other keyers? According to Oliver's post
> it sounds like Ultimatte is still a render hog on those systems.
>
> --- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, "Robin S. Kurz"
> <robin.kurz@...> wrote:
>>
>> I hope you realize that that is a near impossibility to answer
>> reliably in any way, since that depends on a plethora of variables.
>> Such as codec, frame size, disk speed, CPU etc. etc. ...
>>
>> All I can say is that e.g. Primatte in Motion is in real time in HD
>> on any machine not older than 3-4 years. Then again, even on my old
>> G5, in SD.
>>
>> - RK
>>
>>
>> On 11.12.2009, at 21:04, johnrobmoore wrote:
>>
>>> How's the render time for Ultimatte in AE and or FCP. It's a long
>>> process on Avid when it's render time.
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

OT:Re: [FCP-L] OT: How did they do "digital effects" in the analouge era?

This is what happens when I don't get my meds on time. Nurse!!!!

--- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, Steve Hullfish <steve4lists@...> wrote:
>
> Geez, who let the old guys onto the free computers down at the senior
> center? :-)
>
> - from a fellow old guy who always knew how to get the most of his
> 1" ... machine!
>
> On Dec 11, 2009, at 2:53 PM, johnrobmoore wrote:
>
> > Small world I inherited some of those Sony 910 bays when I was an
> > editor/post supervisor on the Dom Deluise version of Candid Camera
> > in the early 90's.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: OT:Re: [FCP-L] OT: How did they do "digital effects" in the analouge era?

You young lads!

And when you got more than 4 or 5 layers (as we'd call them now) on a
Quad tape, you could tell which were the oldest just by looking at them.

Though the Muppet show audience shot had 7 layers, but careful use of
equipment made the complete assembly only 3rd generation. Three
machines and a studio.

The banding wasn't too bad, but after the main edit and a standards
conversion to NTSC, the pictures were, how shall I put it, a little
noisy in places.

Alison


On Dec 11 2009, at 21:13, Steve Hullfish wrote:

> Geez, who let the old guys onto the free computers down at the senior
> center? :-)
>
> - from a fellow old guy who always knew how to get the most of his
> 1" ... machine!
>
> On Dec 11, 2009, at 2:53 PM, johnrobmoore wrote:
>
>> Small world I inherited some of those Sony 910 bays when I was an
>> editor/post supervisor on the Dom Deluise version of Candid Camera
>> in the early 90's.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] OT: Great job

Gee, can't you do, like, everything in iMovie?

--- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, Ross Jones <rjones@...> wrote:
>
> 12 of those applicants have 4 year college degrees. ;) Colleges
> churn out people with those basic skills by the tens of thousands
> each year. There are just not that many jobs waiting for them (and
> never has been) so they've got to do something for all the money they
> spent gaining these "modern" skills.
>
> Problem is my daughter is now learning basic editing skills in 6th grade.
>
> Take a look at VoiceThread: http://voicethread.com/about/k12/
>
> It's a cross between Facebook and iMovie/Garageband.
>
> Something we all may be "faced" with soon,
>
> Ross
>
>
> > > 17 people have applied for this.
> >>
> >> Please kill me now.
> > >
> >> Rick Emery
> > > www.rickemery.com
>


------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: OT:Re: [FCP-L] OT: How did they do "digital effects" in the analouge era?

Geez, who let the old guys onto the free computers down at the senior
center? :-)

- from a fellow old guy who always knew how to get the most of his
1" ... machine!

On Dec 11, 2009, at 2:53 PM, johnrobmoore wrote:

> Small world I inherited some of those Sony 910 bays when I was an
> editor/post supervisor on the Dom Deluise version of Candid Camera
> in the early 90's.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

OT:Re: [FCP-L] OT: How did they do "digital effects" in the analouge era?

Small world I inherited some of those Sony 910 bays when I was an editor/post supervisor on the Dom Deluise version of Candid Camera in the early 90's. First thing I did was get Calloway edit controlers to replace the 910's. The LA Unitel facility took care of the maintenance. Nothing like a good hicon reel for wacky wipes my favorite was the school of fish. Create the body with an oval, tail with a wedge wipe, modulate the wedge to get tail swimming motion. Add an eye if you dare. A-53 multipix with warp for wavey motion and slide the school in source space to move them accross the screen. Damn I think I'm breaking out in tears. Where's a good fish wipe when you need one today?

--- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, "mhollis55" <mhollis55@...> wrote:
>
> John, we must be the old foagies here.
>
> The first real 3D page turn I used was the Abekas A53D, which I used at Inside Edition. We also used it to do box turns and other transitions, as well as key effects and certain posterize, polarize effects. But I blew away the other editors at Inside when I used a 3/4" machine, rolling in tandem (on a Sony 910 editor) to generate really fancy wipes (that I had a friend lay off for me, white to black, then reverse from a GVG 200 switcher) using the keyer on a Grass 110 switcher. These additional wipes really impressed my co-workers, as they thought I was using the Abekas to do that.
>
> One of my favorite moves was to do a stretch transition, stretching a frame longitudinally or vertically as I pushed the video to the incoming picture. I invented that move (for the workgroup I was in) on the Abekas. I saw my transition ideas repeated there for years after I left.
>
> I then learned the ADO which did need some really odd numbers in order to do a page turn. Happily, those who developed the page turn didn't think that they needed anyone to actually pay for their work and the disk with the effect tended to come with the ADO. The next digital effect box I used was the Grass Valley Kaleidoscope which was horrendously expensive. It would do a 3D page peel with a front and a back and a shadow if there were enough channels. Each channel of Kaleidoscope cost a quarter million dollars, so to make a cube in one pass (desirable in the day of the analog 1" machine with no pre-read) one had to drop at least $1.25 million (an additional quarter million for a "combiner").
>
> Edit rooms were "á la carte." Generally you'd get 3 VTRs at the room rate, and then an extra $100 per hour was charged for each channel of digital effects, each machine added and, perhaps an additional $75 per hour for character generation. The highest hourly rate I billed was $1275.00, which I did for three weeks of eight-hour days. My employer was very, very happy, as that client literally paid for another digital effect device.
>
> Today, we look at render time. And we grumble when effects take a long time to render. Back in the linear world, everything was real time, so when you laid it down to tape, it was done. Rendered. And you could look at the full effect as you were building layers (I suppose that kind of workflow is available in Motion these days, as you can add effects while you are rolling through your timeline, but VTRs never dropped frames).
>
> But, when you think about it, everything done to video is a "digital effect" nowadays. A dissolve is a digitally-produced transition on a pixel-by-pixel level. Switchers did that by using a key ramp from one source to another, controlled by a timed transition button or a fader bar.
>
> --- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, John Heiser <jpheiser@> wrote:
> >
> > There was a number hack in ADO for creating a page turn which appeared to
> > twist the page as it moved off the screen, but the original ADO didn't
> > actually do curved surfaces. Quantel was nice but out of reach financially
> > for a lot of operations. Abekas A53D had a nice page roll and, with a
> > combiner for multiple channels, you could do it in one pass. Otherwise, you
> > would lay off your backside pass over superblack to tape machine, and key
> > that along with the frontside.
> >
> > ----
> > John Heiser
> > o2ideas
> > birmingham, alabama, USA
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Marilyn Heiss <mdivah@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > As far as I know--and I am one of the editors of "mature" vintage on
> > > this list -- it was a Quantel product that had the first page turns
> > > for tape post. It might have been the Quantel 5000, or maybe page
> > > turns came in with the Mirage, which is the box that brought in the
> > > shattering glass effect, among others. I know the first Quantel boxes
> > > that came into our edit suites at NBC NY were 2D, then one suite got
> > > the multi-channel Quantel and another got the Mirage. When ADO came
> > > into the picture in all suites, page turns became the transition of
> > > choice among many producers--they wanted to use them for everything....
> > >
> > > I cut a lot of news pieces on economic issues--lots of words with
> > > little video and a lot of graphic representations--in a linear room
> > > using a Grass Valley 1600 switcher and a one-channel 2D Quantel. So
> > > many passes, so many hours to put together something that, as you say,
> > > is now much simpler.
> > >
> > > Marilyn
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 10, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Sune Alexandersen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi group!
> > > > I'm watching an old Norwegian tv-serie made in 1979 and the opening
> > > > title made me think: how on earth did they achieve the page-turn
> > > > transition before.. Eh... Fcp/Avid.. Everything!!
> > > > They used a lot of effects in the good old days that is a simple drag
> > > > and drop operation these days..
> > > >
> > > > Hope some of you with the proper mileage could shed some light on the
> > > > issue!
> > > >
> > > > Regards from rainy Norway,
> > > > Sune Alexandersen
> > > > Sent whilst on the go!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > >
> > > > To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>


------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] How do I get better keying results in FCP?

Let me rephrase the question. In my experience the Ultimatte keyer takes a much longer time to render than other keyers on the same system. My experience is mostly Avid and there is no question the Ultimatte guys do a really good job in this department but I was spoiled by the days of the meridian symphony which had an ultimatte chip and was not a render hog. So how does the render time on an AE or FCP system compare with other keyers? According to Oliver's post it sounds like Ultimatte is still a render hog on those systems.

--- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, "Robin S. Kurz" <robin.kurz@...> wrote:
>
> I hope you realize that that is a near impossibility to answer reliably in any way, since that depends on a plethora of variables. Such as codec, frame size, disk speed, CPU etc. etc. ...
>
> All I can say is that e.g. Primatte in Motion is in real time in HD on any machine not older than 3-4 years. Then again, even on my old G5, in SD.
>
> - RK
>
>
> On 11.12.2009, at 21:04, johnrobmoore wrote:
>
> > How's the render time for Ultimatte in AE and or FCP. It's a long process on Avid when it's render time.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] OT: How did they do "digital effects" in the analouge era?

John, we must be the old foagies here.

The first real 3D page turn I used was the Abekas A53D, which I used at Inside Edition. We also used it to do box turns and other transitions, as well as key effects and certain posterize, polarize effects. But I blew away the other editors at Inside when I used a 3/4" machine, rolling in tandem (on a Sony 910 editor) to generate really fancy wipes (that I had a friend lay off for me, white to black, then reverse from a GVG 200 switcher) using the keyer on a Grass 110 switcher. These additional wipes really impressed my co-workers, as they thought I was using the Abekas to do that.

One of my favorite moves was to do a stretch transition, stretching a frame longitudinally or vertically as I pushed the video to the incoming picture. I invented that move (for the workgroup I was in) on the Abekas. I saw my transition ideas repeated there for years after I left.

I then learned the ADO which did need some really odd numbers in order to do a page turn. Happily, those who developed the page turn didn't think that they needed anyone to actually pay for their work and the disk with the effect tended to come with the ADO. The next digital effect box I used was the Grass Valley Kaleidoscope which was horrendously expensive. It would do a 3D page peel with a front and a back and a shadow if there were enough channels. Each channel of Kaleidoscope cost a quarter million dollars, so to make a cube in one pass (desirable in the day of the analog 1" machine with no pre-read) one had to drop at least $1.25 million (an additional quarter million for a "combiner").

Edit rooms were "á la carte." Generally you'd get 3 VTRs at the room rate, and then an extra $100 per hour was charged for each channel of digital effects, each machine added and, perhaps an additional $75 per hour for character generation. The highest hourly rate I billed was $1275.00, which I did for three weeks of eight-hour days. My employer was very, very happy, as that client literally paid for another digital effect device.

Today, we look at render time. And we grumble when effects take a long time to render. Back in the linear world, everything was real time, so when you laid it down to tape, it was done. Rendered. And you could look at the full effect as you were building layers (I suppose that kind of workflow is available in Motion these days, as you can add effects while you are rolling through your timeline, but VTRs never dropped frames).

But, when you think about it, everything done to video is a "digital effect" nowadays. A dissolve is a digitally-produced transition on a pixel-by-pixel level. Switchers did that by using a key ramp from one source to another, controlled by a timed transition button or a fader bar.

--- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, John Heiser <jpheiser@...> wrote:
>
> There was a number hack in ADO for creating a page turn which appeared to
> twist the page as it moved off the screen, but the original ADO didn't
> actually do curved surfaces. Quantel was nice but out of reach financially
> for a lot of operations. Abekas A53D had a nice page roll and, with a
> combiner for multiple channels, you could do it in one pass. Otherwise, you
> would lay off your backside pass over superblack to tape machine, and key
> that along with the frontside.
>
> ----
> John Heiser
> o2ideas
> birmingham, alabama, USA
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Marilyn Heiss <mdivah@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > As far as I know--and I am one of the editors of "mature" vintage on
> > this list -- it was a Quantel product that had the first page turns
> > for tape post. It might have been the Quantel 5000, or maybe page
> > turns came in with the Mirage, which is the box that brought in the
> > shattering glass effect, among others. I know the first Quantel boxes
> > that came into our edit suites at NBC NY were 2D, then one suite got
> > the multi-channel Quantel and another got the Mirage. When ADO came
> > into the picture in all suites, page turns became the transition of
> > choice among many producers--they wanted to use them for everything....
> >
> > I cut a lot of news pieces on economic issues--lots of words with
> > little video and a lot of graphic representations--in a linear room
> > using a Grass Valley 1600 switcher and a one-channel 2D Quantel. So
> > many passes, so many hours to put together something that, as you say,
> > is now much simpler.
> >
> > Marilyn
> >
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Sune Alexandersen wrote:
> >
> > > Hi group!
> > > I'm watching an old Norwegian tv-serie made in 1979 and the opening
> > > title made me think: how on earth did they achieve the page-turn
> > > transition before.. Eh... Fcp/Avid.. Everything!!
> > > They used a lot of effects in the good old days that is a simple drag
> > > and drop operation these days..
> > >
> > > Hope some of you with the proper mileage could shed some light on the
> > > issue!
> > >
> > > Regards from rainy Norway,
> > > Sune Alexandersen
> > > Sent whilst on the go!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> >
> > >
> > > To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] How do I get better keying results in FCP?

I hope you realize that that is a near impossibility to answer reliably in any way, since that depends on a plethora of variables. Such as codec, frame size, disk speed, CPU etc. etc. ...

All I can say is that e.g. Primatte in Motion is in real time in HD on any machine not older than 3-4 years. Then again, even on my old G5, in SD.

- RK


On 11.12.2009, at 21:04, johnrobmoore wrote:

> How's the render time for Ultimatte in AE and or FCP. It's a long process on Avid when it's render time.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] How do I get better keying results in FCP?

I've had good results with the BCC Plug-in on Avid with DV green
screen. Fast and effective.

On 11 Dec 2009, at 17:56, James R. Tober wrote:

Boris has an amazing keyer for green screen.

+++
With best wishes,

Roger Shufflebottom

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] How do I get better keying results in FCP?

How's the render time for Ultimatte in AE and or FCP. It's a long process on Avid when it's render time.

--- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, "Mark" <markraudonis@...> wrote:
>
> We use Ultimatte "Advantedge". It is dongle protected and expensive, but in my opinion, well worth it. It also works BOTH in After Effects and FCP. Frankly, we do most of our greenscreens in AE then bring it back to FCP.
>
> Mark
>
> --- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, "Rupert Watson" <rupert@> wrote:
> >
> > Among the best are Ultimatte (toolfarm), Photron Primatte (Red Giant) or
> > The Foundry's Keylight.
> >
> >
> >
> > Rupert Watson
> >
> > +44 7787 554 801
> >
> > www.root6.com
> >
> >
> >
> > From: FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Sune Alexandersen
> > Sent: 11 December 2009 11:35
> > To: FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [FCP-L] How do I get better keying results in FCP?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi all!
> > I do quite a lot of green screen work, but it feels like the built-in
> > FCP
> > keyer is quite lacking. What do you people use?
> > Is the included keyer adequate? Third-party plugin maybe?
> > -
> > Dunderfilm // Sune Alexandersen
> > www.dunderfilm.no
> > www.suneworld.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ROOT 6 LIMITED
> > Registered in the UK at
> > 4 WARDOUR MEWS, LONDON
> > W1F 8AJ
> > Company No. 03433253
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>


------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[FCP-L] Re: Sony EX1R Post Workflow

Ah but the first step is the most difficult.

--- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, Roger Shufflebottom <rshuff@...> wrote:
>
> "A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step" . . . Lao-
> Tzu (or possibly Confucius).
>
> On 11 Dec 2009, at 10:23, Rupert Watson wrote:
>
> Roger
>
>
>
> If they are students, surely you should be teaching them how to do both?
> And how to make it work using Final Cut server and a compressor render
> farm to make selects and have them selectively processed to both ProRes
> Pxy and 422 ready for the offline/relink fandango...
>
>
>
> I am only half joking...
>
>
>
> Rupert Watson
>
> +44 7787 554 801
>
> www.root6.com
>
>
> +++
> With best wishes,
>
> Roger Shufflebottom
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> ROOT 6 LIMITED
> Registered in the UK at
> 4 WARDOUR MEWS, LONDON
> W1F 8AJ
> Company No. 03433253
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
> +++
> With best wishes,
>
> Roger Shufflebottom
> Avid Certified Instructor
> http://www.bottom-line.tv
> Tel: +44 1992 535 031 (UK)
> Mobile: +44 7973 543 660
>


------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] How do I get better keying results in FCP?

Boris has an amazing keyer for green screen.


On Dec 11, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Kerry Soloway wrote:

> One of the keyers that I have had the best experience with is those
> in Boris
> Red. Admittedly, I have only used them on an Avid, but they seemed
> to have a
> great number of adjustments that many of the other keyers don't.
>
> I have also used Keylight and ZMatte successfully.
>
> However, all in all, I have to agree with Robin, the key to a
> successful key
> is proper lighting and shooting.
>
> Kerry
> -------------------
> Kerry Soloway
> http://www.NightingaleEditorial.com
> 201-247-4110
> ksoloway@gmail.com
>
> Watch "Consuelo Mack/WealthTrack" weekly on PBS. Check your local
> listings.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:12 PM, James Culbertson
> <albion@speakeasy.net>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Also, Key Correct Pro is now available for FCP (as well as After
>> Effects and others) as a supplement to keying plugins:
>>
>> <
>> http://www.redgiantsoftware.com/products/categories/keying/key-
>> correct-pro/
>>>
>>
>> In FCP, I've used DVMattePro and Primatte.
>>
>> But I tend to find After Effects more efficient in many cases, using
>> Keylight, and sometimes Primatte and Key Correct Pro, in combination
>> with Mocha for AE tracking/shapes and AE masking/keyframing.
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>> On Dec 11, 2009, at 8:01 AM, Steve Hullfish wrote:
>>
>>> I agree with Mark about Ultimatte - AND it works with Photoshop,
>>> too,
>>> not to mention Avid. Before the advent of non-linear, Ultimatte was
>>> the real mainstay of green/bluescreen keying and is still a gold
>>> standard. Experienced compositors will tell you that they actually
>>> choose specific keyers for specific sets of problems/
>>> circumstances, so
>>> it's hard to call any ONE keyer "the best."
>>>
>>> On Dec 11, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Mark wrote:
>>>
>>>> We use Ultimatte "Advantedge". It is dongle protected and
>>>> expensive,
>>>> but in my opinion, well worth it. It also works BOTH in After
>>>> Effects and FCP. Frankly, we do most of our greenscreens in AE then
>>>> bring it back to FCP.
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>> --- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com <FinalCutPro-L%
>>>> 40yahoogroups.com>,
>> "Rupert Watson" <rupert@...>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Among the best are Ultimatte (toolfarm), Photron Primatte (Red
>>>> Giant) or
>>>>> The Foundry's Keylight.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rupert Watson
>>>>>
>>>>> +44 7787 554 801
>>>>>
>>>>> www.root6.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com <FinalCutPro-L%
>>>>> 40yahoogroups.com>
>>>>> [mailto:FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com<FinalCutPro-L%
>>>>> 40yahoogroups.com>]
>> On Behalf Of Sune
>>>> Alexandersen
>>>>> Sent: 11 December 2009 11:35
>>>>> To: FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com <FinalCutPro-L%
>>>>> 40yahoogroups.com>
>>>>> Subject: [FCP-L] How do I get better keying results in FCP?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all!
>>>>> I do quite a lot of green screen work, but it feels like the
>>>>> built-
>>>> in
>>>>> FCP
>>>>> keyer is quite lacking. What do you people use?
>>>>> Is the included keyer adequate? Third-party plugin maybe?
>>>>> -
>>>>> Dunderfilm // Sune Alexandersen
>>>>> www.dunderfilm.no
>>>>> www.suneworld.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ROOT 6 LIMITED
>>>>> Registered in the UK at
>>>>> 4 WARDOUR MEWS, LONDON
>>>>> W1F 8AJ
>>>>> Company No. 03433253
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Search This Blog