Thursday, December 3, 2009

[FCP-L] Upgrading to Snow Leopard

I am going to purchase the new iMac Intel computer, which comes with
Snow Leopard installed. However, I also need to upgrade my current
iMac Intel OS which is still running Tiger. Does anyone know if I
can use the Snow Leopard install disk that comes with the new iMac
computer to upgrade the old one, or do I have to purchase a separate
upgrade OS?

James Tober
Tober Group/Creative Media
260 Fifth Avenue Suite 600
New York, NY 10001
Tel: 212-966-3101
Fax: 212-876-3328
Email: jtober@tobergrp.com

Visit our website at www.tobergrp.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] VO Tool in FCP

Thanks everyone... it wasn't working last night when I went home but when I fired it up this AM it worked... one of those mysteries of FCP I guess.

George

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] VO Tool in FCP

Yes, what Jeff said.

In my experience you may have to swap to another input and back to your USB mic a couple of times in the VO tool before FCP figures out what you want it to do.


On Dec 3, 2009, at 9:12 AM, jeffsengpiehl wrote:

> Change the Audio input in system prefs to any OTHER source then the one desired. Apply, then change it back.. should wake it back up.
>
> JDS
>
> --- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, Don Stark <Don@...> wrote:
>>
>> Probably an obvious question, but did you check system preferences to make sure the USB mic is the input device in the preferences also? I use a USB mic all the time for temp VOs on my videos without any issues.
>>
>> Don
>>
>> Don Stark
>> ScubaVision Productions
>> Boston, MA USA and Providenciales, Turks & Caicos Islands, BWI
>> Weekly Video Netcast at www.ScubaVisions.TV
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:42 AM, mr_ree_mann wrote:
>>
>>> I've used the VO Tool a few years ago through a mixer and into a Kona... but I am at a place that uses a USB mic into FCP for temp VO.
>>>
>>> Its not working and I must be missing as step.
>>>
>>> I can see signal on the meter so know my signal is getting in through the mic and correct input is selected.
>>>
>>> I set record area in the seq with in and out points.
>>>
>>> I hit record, countdown starts.
>>>
>>> Then... nothing shows on the meter when I speak and when I stop recording, nothing appears in the timeline.
>>>
>>> George
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] VO Tool in FCP

Change the Audio input in system prefs to any OTHER source then the one desired. Apply, then change it back.. should wake it back up.

JDS

--- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, Don Stark <Don@...> wrote:
>
> Probably an obvious question, but did you check system preferences to make sure the USB mic is the input device in the preferences also? I use a USB mic all the time for temp VOs on my videos without any issues.
>
> Don
>
> Don Stark
> ScubaVision Productions
> Boston, MA USA and Providenciales, Turks & Caicos Islands, BWI
> Weekly Video Netcast at www.ScubaVisions.TV
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:42 AM, mr_ree_mann wrote:
>
> > I've used the VO Tool a few years ago through a mixer and into a Kona... but I am at a place that uses a USB mic into FCP for temp VO.
> >
> > Its not working and I must be missing as step.
> >
> > I can see signal on the meter so know my signal is getting in through the mic and correct input is selected.
> >
> > I set record area in the seq with in and out points.
> >
> > I hit record, countdown starts.
> >
> > Then... nothing shows on the meter when I speak and when I stop recording, nothing appears in the timeline.
> >
> > George
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] VO Tool in FCP

Probably an obvious question, but did you check system preferences to make sure the USB mic is the input device in the preferences also? I use a USB mic all the time for temp VOs on my videos without any issues.

Don

Don Stark
ScubaVision Productions
Boston, MA USA and Providenciales, Turks & Caicos Islands, BWI
Weekly Video Netcast at www.ScubaVisions.TV


On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:42 AM, mr_ree_mann wrote:

> I've used the VO Tool a few years ago through a mixer and into a Kona... but I am at a place that uses a USB mic into FCP for temp VO.
>
> Its not working and I must be missing as step.
>
> I can see signal on the meter so know my signal is getting in through the mic and correct input is selected.
>
> I set record area in the seq with in and out points.
>
> I hit record, countdown starts.
>
> Then... nothing shows on the meter when I speak and when I stop recording, nothing appears in the timeline.
>
> George
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[FCP-L] VO Tool in FCP

I've used the VO Tool a few years ago through a mixer and into a Kona... but I am at a place that uses a USB mic into FCP for temp VO.

Its not working and I must be missing as step.

I can see signal on the meter so know my signal is getting in through the mic and correct input is selected.

I set record area in the seq with in and out points.

I hit record, countdown starts.

Then... nothing shows on the meter when I speak and when I stop recording, nothing appears in the timeline.

George

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] Add an effect layer to a sequence!

Thank you all for your answers:)
This cleared things up a bit:)
-
Dunderfilm // Sune Alexandersen
www.dunderfilm.no
www.suneworld.com

2009/12/3 Rainer Standke <lists@standke.com>

>
>
> And if it's something like a timecode-burn it can be achieved with an
> imported still frame cropped to the right degree... No need to nest.
>
> Rainer Standke
> XMiL Workflow Tools
> http://www.xmil.biz
>
>
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 14:02 , Kerry Soloway wrote:
>
> > Although that is not a bad idea, one has to be careful of clips with
> > more
> > than one effect. The order of effects may affect the final look. For
> > instance, if you are going to use a Widescreen Matte, you probably
> > want that
> > to be last so that if you apply any color correction, it doesn't
> > affect the
> > black matte.
> >
> > It also becomes more of a hassle if you want to change the effect.
> > If you
> > add your Vignette to a clip with other filters and paste it onto
> > clips with
> > other filters, what do you do if you want to change the Vignette?
> > You will
> > have to manually go to each clip to remove or modify the outdated
> > effect.
> >
> > Kerry
> > -------------------
> > Kerry Soloway
> > http://www.NightingaleEditorial.com
> > 201-247-4110
> > ksoloway@gmail.com <ksoloway%40gmail.com>
> >
> > Watch "Consuelo Mack/WealthTrack" weekly on PBS. Check your local
> > listings.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Andy Edwards <aedigitaltv@mac.com<aedigitaltv%40mac.com>>
>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> You could also apply effect to one clip and copy, paste attributes
> >> (filters) to all the rest. Just depends on how complicated your
> >> sequences is.
> >>
> >> Andy Edwards
> >>
> >>
> >> On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Kerry Soloway wrote:
> >>
> >>> Nest.
> >>>
> >>> This is one of those things that Final Cut definitely does
> >>> differently.
> >>>
> >>> Kerry
> >>> -------------------
> >>> Kerry Soloway
> >>> http://www.NightingaleEditorial.com
> >>> 201-247-4110
> >>> ksoloway@gmail.com <ksoloway%40gmail.com> <ksoloway%40gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> Watch "Consuelo Mack/WealthTrack" weekly on PBS. Check your local
> >>> listings.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Sune Alexandersen
> >>> <suneworld@gmail.com <suneworld%40gmail.com> <suneworld%40gmail.com
> >>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi group!
> >>>> I would like to add the "vignette" effect to my entire sequnce like
> >>>> I can
> >>>> do
> >>>> in Avid with an effect layer.
> >>>>
> >>>> Can this be done in FCP of do I have to use nested sequences?
> >>>>
> >>>> -
> >>>> Dunderfilm // Sune Alexandersen
> >>>> www.dunderfilm.no
> >>>> www.suneworld.com
> >>>>
> >>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] "Master clip not present" annoyance

Ooh, wait. I did pull over the producer's "rough edits" from his sloppy
project into my own. (shit)

He didn't make new sequences, he duped the project.

Am I screwed?

Tim M.

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Shane Ross <comeback@mac.com> wrote:

> Are your sequences in a different project file than the footage?
>
> -shane
>
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Tim McLaughlin wrote:
>
> > I keep getting "master clip not present" when trying to reveal a
> > clip in the
> > browser.
> >
> > I did have to relink media on this job, but this is getting to be a
> > PITA.
> >
> > Anyone have a quick and easy way to help me resolve this?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Tim McLaughlin
> > Final Cut and Avid Editor
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Re: [FCP-L] Broadcast Monitor

I'm looking to sell my Sony 14" CRT PVM-14L5 (1080psf24 capable) with
the optional HD-SDI card if anyone is interested...


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
ERIK A. HANSEN
erik@monkeyswithchopstix.com, eahansen@gmail.com
AIM: error1k

"If it works, it's obsolete."
- Marshall McLuhan


------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] Add an effect layer to a sequence!

And if it's something like a timecode-burn it can be achieved with an
imported still frame cropped to the right degree... No need to nest.

Rainer Standke
XMiL Workflow Tools
http://www.xmil.biz

On Dec 2, 2009, at 14:02 , Kerry Soloway wrote:

> Although that is not a bad idea, one has to be careful of clips with
> more
> than one effect. The order of effects may affect the final look. For
> instance, if you are going to use a Widescreen Matte, you probably
> want that
> to be last so that if you apply any color correction, it doesn't
> affect the
> black matte.
>
> It also becomes more of a hassle if you want to change the effect.
> If you
> add your Vignette to a clip with other filters and paste it onto
> clips with
> other filters, what do you do if you want to change the Vignette?
> You will
> have to manually go to each clip to remove or modify the outdated
> effect.
>
> Kerry
> -------------------
> Kerry Soloway
> http://www.NightingaleEditorial.com
> 201-247-4110
> ksoloway@gmail.com
>
> Watch "Consuelo Mack/WealthTrack" weekly on PBS. Check your local
> listings.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Andy Edwards <aedigitaltv@mac.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> You could also apply effect to one clip and copy, paste attributes
>> (filters) to all the rest. Just depends on how complicated your
>> sequences is.
>>
>> Andy Edwards
>>
>>
>> On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Kerry Soloway wrote:
>>
>>> Nest.
>>>
>>> This is one of those things that Final Cut definitely does
>>> differently.
>>>
>>> Kerry
>>> -------------------
>>> Kerry Soloway
>>> http://www.NightingaleEditorial.com
>>> 201-247-4110
>>> ksoloway@gmail.com <ksoloway%40gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Watch "Consuelo Mack/WealthTrack" weekly on PBS. Check your local
>>> listings.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Sune Alexandersen
>>> <suneworld@gmail.com <suneworld%40gmail.com>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi group!
>>>> I would like to add the "vignette" effect to my entire sequnce like
>>>> I can
>>>> do
>>>> in Avid with an effect layer.
>>>>
>>>> Can this be done in FCP of do I have to use nested sequences?
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> Dunderfilm // Sune Alexandersen
>>>> www.dunderfilm.no
>>>> www.suneworld.com
>>>>
>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] Broadcast Monitor

As much as I prefer a more robust scope than the Ultra it is a real scope for looking at important parade display and vector scope basics. The in monitor waveform is nothing compared to the Ultra. It's a poor mans in the field rough guide at best.

--- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, Lou Wirth <loutv@...> wrote:
>
> Seems like if you are putting a room together and had a budget line
> for an ultra scope set up (which when said and done runs about 2700),
> you are better off getting one of these monitors which has a simple
> set of scopes included. You get the HD monitor and a wave/vector set
> up in one swoop. No?
>
> Lou
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 4:02 PM, Shane Ross wrote:
>
> > I have seen the 2550s, and they are TONS better than the original
> > panels. But I still think the FSI is a better monitor. I haven't
> > seen them side by side to compare, but going by memory.
> >
> > Hey Terry...time for the Editor's Lounge to do another MONITOR
> > SHOOTOUT...
> >
> > -shane
> >
> > On Dec 2, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Jim Feeley wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm offering another alternative. Bang
> >> for buck
> >> is pretty amorphous, and "capable of 1080" could also mean different
> >> things.
> >> For some people, 1:1 mapping is more important than it is to others.
> >>
> >> But have you used the LH2550? If not, then I don't know if you can
> >> say the
> >> FSI is better than Panasonic models. Perhaps it's better than some,
> >> but not
> >> necessarily all. The LH2550 appeared to be significantly better than
> >> the
> >> Panasonic LCDs from two-three years ago.
> >>
> >> Anyway, I figure we're all just recommending a list of monitors for
> >> Nigel to
> >> view. I don't think he's going to buy blind. But then, if he was
> >> blind he'd
> >> probably be satisfied with a much less expensive monitor...
> >>
> >> Jim
> >>
> >> On 12/2/09 2:56 PM, "Shane Ross" <comeback@...> wrote:
> >>
> >>> 1:1 mapping isn't CRUCIAL. And I stand by this monitor being better
> >>> than the Panasonic models. But the one you mention is higher priced
> >>> than the one I mentioned. if you want a good comparison, then I'd
> >>> look at the FSI 2450W. That IS 1:1 pixel mapping for 1080i signals,
> >>> and around $5000.
> >>>
> >>> The question was bang for the buck, and I think that the 1760W at
> >>> $2500 is a great deal.
> >>>
> >>> -shane
> >>>
> >>> On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Jim Feeley wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> That FSI monitor has 1366x768 resolution.
> >>>>
> >>>> I just worked with a Panasonic BT-LH2550 26ish-inch LCD that has
> >>>> 1920x1080
> >>>> one-to-one pixel mapping. Looked good. WFM and scope were bigger
> >> and
> >>>> higher
> >>>> resolution than on some older Panasonics that I've seen. However,
> >>>> this was
> >>>> on a stage, not in post. The DP seemed happy, but I was focusing on
> >>>> somehting else. We didn't look at SD images. $5000.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think someone else on FCP-L or Avid-L2 tried and liked that
> >> monitor.
> >>>>
> >>>> HTH at least a little,
> >>>>
> >>>> Jim
> >>>>
> >>>> On 12/2/09 2:29 PM, "Shane Ross" <comeback@...> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> FSI 1760W. Or the smaller 1770W. But the 1760 has bang for buck.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://flandersscientific.com/index/Broadcast_Monitors
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Nigel Ray Williamson wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I know this has been covered before but I don't have my
> >> computer in
> >>>>>> front of me. What's the best bang for your buck HD/SD switchable
> >>>>>> broadcast monitor capable of 1080 on the market at the moment?
> >>>> There's
> >>>>>> a Panasonic that's apparently really good but for the life of
> >> me I
> >>>>>> can't remember the model number.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks in advance
> >>>>>> Nigel
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sent from my mobile device.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ------------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> >>>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jim Feeley
> >>>> POV Media
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jim Feeley
> >> POV Media
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
> Lou Wirth Productions
> 500Tamal Plaza, Suite 522
> Corte Madera, CA 94925
> www.louwirth.com
> 415-924-9411p
>


------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] Broadcast Monitor

I agree - FSI 1760W

Bob Zelin

----- Original Message -----
From: "Shane Ross" <comeback@mac.com>
To: <FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [FCP-L] Broadcast Monitor


> FSI 1760W. Or the smaller 1770W. But the 1760 has bang for buck.
>
> http://flandersscientific.com/index/Broadcast_Monitors
>
>
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Nigel Ray Williamson wrote:
>
>> I know this has been covered before but I don't have my computer in
>> front of me. What's the best bang for your buck HD/SD switchable
>> broadcast monitor capable of 1080 on the market at the moment? There's
>> a Panasonic that's apparently really good but for the life of me I
>> can't remember the model number.
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>> Nigel
>>
>> Sent from my mobile device.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] "Master clip not present" annoyance

You can drag all the clips from the sequence to the browser and it will create new master clips, assuming this is v7.

All the best,

Tom

On Dec 2, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Tim McLaughlin wrote:

> I keep getting "master clip not present" when trying to reveal a clip in the
> browser.
>
> I did have to relink media on this job, but this is getting to be a PITA.
>
> Anyone have a quick and easy way to help me resolve this?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tim McLaughlin
> Final Cut and Avid Editor
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] Broadcast Monitor

I don't think I'd trust the scopes on a monitor. Not quite up to the
snuff of the real deal.

-shane

On Dec 2, 2009, at 4:10 PM, Lou Wirth wrote:

> Seems like if you are putting a room together and had a budget line
> for an ultra scope set up (which when said and done runs about 2700),
> you are better off getting one of these monitors which has a simple
> set of scopes included. You get the HD monitor and a wave/vector set
> up in one swoop. No?
>
> Lou
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 4:02 PM, Shane Ross wrote:
>
> > I have seen the 2550s, and they are TONS better than the original
> > panels. But I still think the FSI is a better monitor. I haven't
> > seen them side by side to compare, but going by memory.
> >
> > Hey Terry...time for the Editor's Lounge to do another MONITOR
> > SHOOTOUT...
> >
> > -shane
> >
> > On Dec 2, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Jim Feeley wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm offering another alternative. Bang
> >> for buck
> >> is pretty amorphous, and "capable of 1080" could also mean
> different
> >> things.
> >> For some people, 1:1 mapping is more important than it is to
> others.
> >>
> >> But have you used the LH2550? If not, then I don't know if you can
> >> say the
> >> FSI is better than Panasonic models. Perhaps it's better than some,
> >> but not
> >> necessarily all. The LH2550 appeared to be significantly better
> than
> >> the
> >> Panasonic LCDs from two-three years ago.
> >>
> >> Anyway, I figure we're all just recommending a list of monitors for
> >> Nigel to
> >> view. I don't think he's going to buy blind. But then, if he was
> >> blind he'd
> >> probably be satisfied with a much less expensive monitor...
> >>
> >> Jim
> >>
> >> On 12/2/09 2:56 PM, "Shane Ross" <comeback@mac.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> 1:1 mapping isn't CRUCIAL. And I stand by this monitor being
> better
> >>> than the Panasonic models. But the one you mention is higher
> priced
> >>> than the one I mentioned. if you want a good comparison, then I'd
> >>> look at the FSI 2450W. That IS 1:1 pixel mapping for 1080i
> signals,
> >>> and around $5000.
> >>>
> >>> The question was bang for the buck, and I think that the 1760W at
> >>> $2500 is a great deal.
> >>>
> >>> -shane
> >>>
> >>> On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Jim Feeley wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> That FSI monitor has 1366x768 resolution.
> >>>>
> >>>> I just worked with a Panasonic BT-LH2550 26ish-inch LCD that has
> >>>> 1920x1080
> >>>> one-to-one pixel mapping. Looked good. WFM and scope were bigger
> >> and
> >>>> higher
> >>>> resolution than on some older Panasonics that I've seen. However,
> >>>> this was
> >>>> on a stage, not in post. The DP seemed happy, but I was
> focusing on
> >>>> somehting else. We didn't look at SD images. $5000.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think someone else on FCP-L or Avid-L2 tried and liked that
> >> monitor.
> >>>>
> >>>> HTH at least a little,
> >>>>
> >>>> Jim
> >>>>
> >>>> On 12/2/09 2:29 PM, "Shane Ross" <comeback@mac.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> FSI 1760W. Or the smaller 1770W. But the 1760 has bang for buck.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://flandersscientific.com/index/Broadcast_Monitors
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Nigel Ray Williamson wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I know this has been covered before but I don't have my
> >> computer in
> >>>>>> front of me. What's the best bang for your buck HD/SD
> switchable
> >>>>>> broadcast monitor capable of 1080 on the market at the moment?
> >>>> There's
> >>>>>> a Panasonic that's apparently really good but for the life of
> >> me I
> >>>>>> can't remember the model number.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks in advance
> >>>>>> Nigel
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sent from my mobile device.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ------------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> >>>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jim Feeley
> >>>> POV Media
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jim Feeley
> >> POV Media
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
> Lou Wirth Productions
> 500Tamal Plaza, Suite 522
> Corte Madera, CA 94925
> www.louwirth.com
> 415-924-9411p
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] Broadcast Monitor

Seems like if you are putting a room together and had a budget line
for an ultra scope set up (which when said and done runs about 2700),
you are better off getting one of these monitors which has a simple
set of scopes included. You get the HD monitor and a wave/vector set
up in one swoop. No?

Lou
On Dec 2, 2009, at 4:02 PM, Shane Ross wrote:

> I have seen the 2550s, and they are TONS better than the original
> panels. But I still think the FSI is a better monitor. I haven't
> seen them side by side to compare, but going by memory.
>
> Hey Terry...time for the Editor's Lounge to do another MONITOR
> SHOOTOUT...
>
> -shane
>
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Jim Feeley wrote:
>
>> I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm offering another alternative. Bang
>> for buck
>> is pretty amorphous, and "capable of 1080" could also mean different
>> things.
>> For some people, 1:1 mapping is more important than it is to others.
>>
>> But have you used the LH2550? If not, then I don't know if you can
>> say the
>> FSI is better than Panasonic models. Perhaps it's better than some,
>> but not
>> necessarily all. The LH2550 appeared to be significantly better than
>> the
>> Panasonic LCDs from two-three years ago.
>>
>> Anyway, I figure we're all just recommending a list of monitors for
>> Nigel to
>> view. I don't think he's going to buy blind. But then, if he was
>> blind he'd
>> probably be satisfied with a much less expensive monitor...
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> On 12/2/09 2:56 PM, "Shane Ross" <comeback@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> 1:1 mapping isn't CRUCIAL. And I stand by this monitor being better
>>> than the Panasonic models. But the one you mention is higher priced
>>> than the one I mentioned. if you want a good comparison, then I'd
>>> look at the FSI 2450W. That IS 1:1 pixel mapping for 1080i signals,
>>> and around $5000.
>>>
>>> The question was bang for the buck, and I think that the 1760W at
>>> $2500 is a great deal.
>>>
>>> -shane
>>>
>>> On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Jim Feeley wrote:
>>>
>>>> That FSI monitor has 1366x768 resolution.
>>>>
>>>> I just worked with a Panasonic BT-LH2550 26ish-inch LCD that has
>>>> 1920x1080
>>>> one-to-one pixel mapping. Looked good. WFM and scope were bigger
>> and
>>>> higher
>>>> resolution than on some older Panasonics that I've seen. However,
>>>> this was
>>>> on a stage, not in post. The DP seemed happy, but I was focusing on
>>>> somehting else. We didn't look at SD images. $5000.
>>>>
>>>> I think someone else on FCP-L or Avid-L2 tried and liked that
>> monitor.
>>>>
>>>> HTH at least a little,
>>>>
>>>> Jim
>>>>
>>>> On 12/2/09 2:29 PM, "Shane Ross" <comeback@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> FSI 1760W. Or the smaller 1770W. But the 1760 has bang for buck.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://flandersscientific.com/index/Broadcast_Monitors
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Nigel Ray Williamson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I know this has been covered before but I don't have my
>> computer in
>>>>>> front of me. What's the best bang for your buck HD/SD switchable
>>>>>> broadcast monitor capable of 1080 on the market at the moment?
>>>> There's
>>>>>> a Panasonic that's apparently really good but for the life of
>> me I
>>>>>> can't remember the model number.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>> Nigel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my mobile device.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
>>>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jim Feeley
>>>> POV Media
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jim Feeley
>> POV Media
>>
>>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Lou Wirth Productions
500Tamal Plaza, Suite 522
Corte Madera, CA 94925
www.louwirth.com
415-924-9411p

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] Add an effect layer to a sequence!

Option-double-clicking the nest will also load the nest into the viewer

Joe Stern
CNN Post Production
Atlanta


On 12/2/09 4:44 PM, "Kerry Soloway" <ksoloway@gmail.com> wrote:

> The nested sequence should always update the final.
>
> I just finished a half hour show, the center 20 minutes of which, was a
> nested sequence. Whenever I lengthened or shortened the original, the final
> show rippled to reflect those changes.
>
> Just remember that when you want to open the nested sequence in the Viewer,
> you need to right-click it. If you double-click, it will open in the
> timeline.
>
> Kerry
> -------------------
> Kerry Soloway
> http://www.NightingaleEditorial.com
> 201-247-4110
> ksoloway@gmail.com
>
> Watch "Consuelo Mack/WealthTrack" weekly on PBS. Check your local listings.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Sune Alexandersen <suneworld@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks Kerry. Premiere also needs nesting.
>>
>> Does this mean that the nested sequence will always be updated or do I have
>> to relink and reapply if I edit the original sequence?
>>
>> -
>> Dunderfilm // Sune Alexandersen
>> www.dunderfilm.no
>> www.suneworld.com
>>
>> 2009/12/2 Kerry Soloway <ksoloway@gmail.com <ksoloway%40gmail.com>>
>>
>>
>>> Nest.
>>>
>>> This is one of those things that Final Cut definitely does differently.
>>>
>>> Kerry
>>> -------------------
>>> Kerry Soloway
>>> http://www.NightingaleEditorial.com
>>> 201-247-4110
>>> ksoloway@gmail.com <ksoloway%40gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Watch "Consuelo Mack/WealthTrack" weekly on PBS. Check your local
>> listings.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Sune Alexandersen
>>> <suneworld@gmail.com<suneworld%40gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi group!
>>>> I would like to add the "vignette" effect to my entire sequnce like I
>> can
>>>> do
>>>> in Avid with an effect layer.
>>>>
>>>> Can this be done in FCP of do I have to use nested sequences?
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> Dunderfilm // Sune Alexandersen
>>>> www.dunderfilm.no
>>>> www.suneworld.com
>>>>
>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>
>>>
>>> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] Broadcast Monitor

Yeah to see which monitors suck less. Do you know how many matched Coax cables I had to make for that in the interest of fairness. I know it's SDI but back in the analogue days, cue banjo, you had to have matched cables to compare monitors fairly. Of course this was after walking through the snow uphill to the Editors' Lounge. ;-)

--- In FinalCutPro-L@yahoogroups.com, Shane Ross <comeback@...> wrote:
>
> I have seen the 2550s, and they are TONS better than the original
> panels. But I still think the FSI is a better monitor. I haven't
> seen them side by side to compare, but going by memory.
>
> Hey Terry...time for the Editor's Lounge to do another MONITOR
> SHOOTOUT...
>
> -shane
>
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Jim Feeley wrote:
>
> > I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm offering another alternative. Bang
> > for buck
> > is pretty amorphous, and "capable of 1080" could also mean different
> > things.
> > For some people, 1:1 mapping is more important than it is to others.
> >
> > But have you used the LH2550? If not, then I don't know if you can
> > say the
> > FSI is better than Panasonic models. Perhaps it's better than some,
> > but not
> > necessarily all. The LH2550 appeared to be significantly better than
> > the
> > Panasonic LCDs from two-three years ago.
> >
> > Anyway, I figure we're all just recommending a list of monitors for
> > Nigel to
> > view. I don't think he's going to buy blind. But then, if he was
> > blind he'd
> > probably be satisfied with a much less expensive monitor...
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > On 12/2/09 2:56 PM, "Shane Ross" <comeback@...> wrote:
> >
> > > 1:1 mapping isn't CRUCIAL. And I stand by this monitor being better
> > > than the Panasonic models. But the one you mention is higher priced
> > > than the one I mentioned. if you want a good comparison, then I'd
> > > look at the FSI 2450W. That IS 1:1 pixel mapping for 1080i signals,
> > > and around $5000.
> > >
> > > The question was bang for the buck, and I think that the 1760W at
> > > $2500 is a great deal.
> > >
> > > -shane
> > >
> > > On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Jim Feeley wrote:
> > >
> > >> That FSI monitor has 1366x768 resolution.
> > >>
> > >> I just worked with a Panasonic BT-LH2550 26ish-inch LCD that has
> > >> 1920x1080
> > >> one-to-one pixel mapping. Looked good. WFM and scope were bigger
> > and
> > >> higher
> > >> resolution than on some older Panasonics that I've seen. However,
> > >> this was
> > >> on a stage, not in post. The DP seemed happy, but I was focusing on
> > >> somehting else. We didn't look at SD images. $5000.
> > >>
> > >> I think someone else on FCP-L or Avid-L2 tried and liked that
> > monitor.
> > >>
> > >> HTH at least a little,
> > >>
> > >> Jim
> > >>
> > >> On 12/2/09 2:29 PM, "Shane Ross" <comeback@...> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> FSI 1760W. Or the smaller 1770W. But the 1760 has bang for buck.
> > >>>
> > >>> http://flandersscientific.com/index/Broadcast_Monitors
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Nigel Ray Williamson wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I know this has been covered before but I don't have my
> > computer in
> > >>>> front of me. What's the best bang for your buck HD/SD switchable
> > >>>> broadcast monitor capable of 1080 on the market at the moment?
> > >> There's
> > >>>> a Panasonic that's apparently really good but for the life of
> > me I
> > >>>> can't remember the model number.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks in advance
> > >>>> Nigel
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Sent from my mobile device.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ------------------------------------
> > >>>
> > >>> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> > >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Jim Feeley
> > >> POV Media
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Jim Feeley
> > POV Media
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] Broadcast Monitor

>Hey Terry...time for the Editor's Lounge to do another
>MONITOR SHOOTOUT...

There's something we definitely agree on... ;-)

Jim

On 12/2/09 4:02 PM, "Shane Ross" <comeback@mac.com> wrote:

> I have seen the 2550s, and they are TONS better than the original
> panels. But I still think the FSI is a better monitor. I haven't
> seen them side by side to compare, but going by memory.
>
> Hey Terry...time for the Editor's Lounge to do another MONITOR
> SHOOTOUT...
>
> -shane
>
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Jim Feeley wrote:
>
>> I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm offering another alternative. Bang
>> for buck
>> is pretty amorphous, and "capable of 1080" could also mean different
>> things.
>> For some people, 1:1 mapping is more important than it is to others.
>>
>> But have you used the LH2550? If not, then I don't know if you can
>> say the
>> FSI is better than Panasonic models. Perhaps it's better than some,
>> but not
>> necessarily all. The LH2550 appeared to be significantly better than
>> the
>> Panasonic LCDs from two-three years ago.
>>
>> Anyway, I figure we're all just recommending a list of monitors for
>> Nigel to
>> view. I don't think he's going to buy blind. But then, if he was
>> blind he'd
>> probably be satisfied with a much less expensive monitor...
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> On 12/2/09 2:56 PM, "Shane Ross" <comeback@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> 1:1 mapping isn't CRUCIAL. And I stand by this monitor being better
>>> than the Panasonic models. But the one you mention is higher priced
>>> than the one I mentioned. if you want a good comparison, then I'd
>>> look at the FSI 2450W. That IS 1:1 pixel mapping for 1080i signals,
>>> and around $5000.
>>>
>>> The question was bang for the buck, and I think that the 1760W at
>>> $2500 is a great deal.
>>>
>>> -shane
>>>
>>> On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Jim Feeley wrote:
>>>
>>>> That FSI monitor has 1366x768 resolution.
>>>>
>>>> I just worked with a Panasonic BT-LH2550 26ish-inch LCD that has
>>>> 1920x1080
>>>> one-to-one pixel mapping. Looked good. WFM and scope were bigger
>> and
>>>> higher
>>>> resolution than on some older Panasonics that I've seen. However,
>>>> this was
>>>> on a stage, not in post. The DP seemed happy, but I was focusing on
>>>> somehting else. We didn't look at SD images. $5000.
>>>>
>>>> I think someone else on FCP-L or Avid-L2 tried and liked that
>> monitor.
>>>>
>>>> HTH at least a little,
>>>>
>>>> Jim
>>>>
>>>> On 12/2/09 2:29 PM, "Shane Ross" <comeback@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> FSI 1760W. Or the smaller 1770W. But the 1760 has bang for buck.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://flandersscientific.com/index/Broadcast_Monitors
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Nigel Ray Williamson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I know this has been covered before but I don't have my
>> computer in
>>>>>> front of me. What's the best bang for your buck HD/SD switchable
>>>>>> broadcast monitor capable of 1080 on the market at the moment?
>>>> There's
>>>>>> a Panasonic that's apparently really good but for the life of
>> me I
>>>>>> can't remember the model number.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>> Nigel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my mobile device.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
>>>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jim Feeley
>>>> POV Media
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jim Feeley
>> POV Media
>>
>>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

--
Jim Feeley
POV Media


------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] Broadcast Monitor

I have seen the 2550s, and they are TONS better than the original
panels. But I still think the FSI is a better monitor. I haven't
seen them side by side to compare, but going by memory.

Hey Terry...time for the Editor's Lounge to do another MONITOR
SHOOTOUT...

-shane

On Dec 2, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Jim Feeley wrote:

> I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm offering another alternative. Bang
> for buck
> is pretty amorphous, and "capable of 1080" could also mean different
> things.
> For some people, 1:1 mapping is more important than it is to others.
>
> But have you used the LH2550? If not, then I don't know if you can
> say the
> FSI is better than Panasonic models. Perhaps it's better than some,
> but not
> necessarily all. The LH2550 appeared to be significantly better than
> the
> Panasonic LCDs from two-three years ago.
>
> Anyway, I figure we're all just recommending a list of monitors for
> Nigel to
> view. I don't think he's going to buy blind. But then, if he was
> blind he'd
> probably be satisfied with a much less expensive monitor...
>
> Jim
>
> On 12/2/09 2:56 PM, "Shane Ross" <comeback@mac.com> wrote:
>
> > 1:1 mapping isn't CRUCIAL. And I stand by this monitor being better
> > than the Panasonic models. But the one you mention is higher priced
> > than the one I mentioned. if you want a good comparison, then I'd
> > look at the FSI 2450W. That IS 1:1 pixel mapping for 1080i signals,
> > and around $5000.
> >
> > The question was bang for the buck, and I think that the 1760W at
> > $2500 is a great deal.
> >
> > -shane
> >
> > On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Jim Feeley wrote:
> >
> >> That FSI monitor has 1366x768 resolution.
> >>
> >> I just worked with a Panasonic BT-LH2550 26ish-inch LCD that has
> >> 1920x1080
> >> one-to-one pixel mapping. Looked good. WFM and scope were bigger
> and
> >> higher
> >> resolution than on some older Panasonics that I've seen. However,
> >> this was
> >> on a stage, not in post. The DP seemed happy, but I was focusing on
> >> somehting else. We didn't look at SD images. $5000.
> >>
> >> I think someone else on FCP-L or Avid-L2 tried and liked that
> monitor.
> >>
> >> HTH at least a little,
> >>
> >> Jim
> >>
> >> On 12/2/09 2:29 PM, "Shane Ross" <comeback@mac.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> FSI 1760W. Or the smaller 1770W. But the 1760 has bang for buck.
> >>>
> >>> http://flandersscientific.com/index/Broadcast_Monitors
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Nigel Ray Williamson wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I know this has been covered before but I don't have my
> computer in
> >>>> front of me. What's the best bang for your buck HD/SD switchable
> >>>> broadcast monitor capable of 1080 on the market at the moment?
> >> There's
> >>>> a Panasonic that's apparently really good but for the life of
> me I
> >>>> can't remember the model number.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks in advance
> >>>> Nigel
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent from my mobile device.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jim Feeley
> >> POV Media
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jim Feeley
> POV Media
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [FCP-L] Broadcast Monitor

I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm offering another alternative. Bang for buck
is pretty amorphous, and "capable of 1080" could also mean different things.
For some people, 1:1 mapping is more important than it is to others.

But have you used the LH2550? If not, then I don't know if you can say the
FSI is better than Panasonic models. Perhaps it's better than some, but not
necessarily all. The LH2550 appeared to be significantly better than the
Panasonic LCDs from two-three years ago.

Anyway, I figure we're all just recommending a list of monitors for Nigel to
view. I don't think he's going to buy blind. But then, if he was blind he'd
probably be satisfied with a much less expensive monitor...

Jim


On 12/2/09 2:56 PM, "Shane Ross" <comeback@mac.com> wrote:

> 1:1 mapping isn't CRUCIAL. And I stand by this monitor being better
> than the Panasonic models. But the one you mention is higher priced
> than the one I mentioned. if you want a good comparison, then I'd
> look at the FSI 2450W. That IS 1:1 pixel mapping for 1080i signals,
> and around $5000.
>
> The question was bang for the buck, and I think that the 1760W at
> $2500 is a great deal.
>
> -shane
>
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Jim Feeley wrote:
>
>> That FSI monitor has 1366x768 resolution.
>>
>> I just worked with a Panasonic BT-LH2550 26ish-inch LCD that has
>> 1920x1080
>> one-to-one pixel mapping. Looked good. WFM and scope were bigger and
>> higher
>> resolution than on some older Panasonics that I've seen. However,
>> this was
>> on a stage, not in post. The DP seemed happy, but I was focusing on
>> somehting else. We didn't look at SD images. $5000.
>>
>> I think someone else on FCP-L or Avid-L2 tried and liked that monitor.
>>
>> HTH at least a little,
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> On 12/2/09 2:29 PM, "Shane Ross" <comeback@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> FSI 1760W. Or the smaller 1770W. But the 1760 has bang for buck.
>>>
>>> http://flandersscientific.com/index/Broadcast_Monitors
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Nigel Ray Williamson wrote:
>>>
>>>> I know this has been covered before but I don't have my computer in
>>>> front of me. What's the best bang for your buck HD/SD switchable
>>>> broadcast monitor capable of 1080 on the market at the moment?
>> There's
>>>> a Panasonic that's apparently really good but for the life of me I
>>>> can't remember the model number.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>> Nigel
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my mobile device.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jim Feeley
>> POV Media
>>
>>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

--
Jim Feeley
POV Media


------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Search This Blog