Re: [FCP-L] The Real story about controversial WW2 film archival procedures

I agree that my article needs to be taken with as much salt as
anything else on the internet. I make mistakes as Jeff pointed out,
though trying to transcribe exact words from a phone interview with a
guy with a French accent is NOT easy. I only know the intent of my own
article (to be honest and provide what I believe are the facts) and
that I have the source audio so I know what was really said and that I
have some semblance of understanding of the topic, so my contextual
understanding of what was said is colored by that.

Jeff Kreines had excellent comments on the article and I noted them
and responded to them. I am updating the article right now (revisions
will be up in maybe an hour) with new photos and information from Mr.
Lumiere who also read Jeff's comments.

On Nov 18, 2009, at 11:08 AM, egleske wrote:

> Steve Hullfish typed and sent:
>
> > Here's the URL for my story on www.provideocoalition.com. If I say
> so
> > myself, it's an interesting read. It may not quell the debate over
> the
> > transfer procedures. It may actually inflame them.
> >
> > By the way, the series was edited on Final Cut Pro and EditShare and
> > color corrected on Apple Color.
> >
> > On Nov 18, 2009, at 2:17 AM, Eric J. Gleske wrote:
>
> Thanks for pointing me in the correct direction for another look at
> this topic- albeit on the internet... ;-)
>
> It is an interesting read. It sounds like an interesting project in
> scope and scale. I'm sure that everyone involved in their production
> and technical capacities brought their "A" game and tackled a
> monumental task in a productive manner.
>
> The intense debate is and should be over the handling of archival
> materials; not about cropping decisions, cards, cameras, and codecs
> used, or whether it was posted on a Mac or PC. As of this morning,
> LumiereHD.com is still promoting the Shakefire.com interview on
> their homepage, but not yours, which could perhaps clarify the very
> items that touched of the raging debate. Archivist and those who
> work with them are rightly ruffled when reading such things as are
> being promoted by Lumiere. At the very least, for people working on
> the next project of similar scope, greater care will be taken with
> ALL materials, no matter how trivial they might be thought by those
> handling them.
>
> I think Jeff Kreines' comments at your article are worth noting as
> well, and should be used to further other important discussions.
>
> Back to the internet to find my kidneys...
>
> Eric Gleske
> Somewhat in Oregon
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/