Posts
Thanks for your replies, Robin
The reason that I am asking is twofold:
1. As I am editing HDV 1080i50 in a ProRes 422 SD project I am trying to ensure that any sharpening is done on the HDV file (rather than a downsampled SD one).
2. Also, Sending to Motion is not implemented properly in that not only are any moves in the FCP motion tab lost, but also a clip is only 'sent' to Motion WITHOUT any material inside dissolves, meaning that all dissolves need to be removed prior to sending and then rebuilt afterwards. Hence my desire to stay within FCP (especially if FCP7 has a better Sharpening filter than FCP6 - someone must know this). I have about 70 of these shots.
Thanks, Crispin
------------
Crispin Holland, Director, CrispTV Ltd - www.crisptv.
--- In FinalCutPro-
>
>
> On 19.10.2009, at 12:26, hllndc wrote:
>
> > I'd like to avoid going into Apple Motion as it complicates things
> > as I've tried 'Send To' from FCP to Motion and you need to re-do all
> > the moves & presumably lose some precious resolution (and more
> > focus)...
>
> And no, there is NO resolution loss or the likes. Also, animating in
> Motion is far superior and controllable, so that also doesn't in fact
> pose any type of disadvantage. If push comes to shove, and you don't
> care to learn the (I'm assuming) basics of animation in Motion, you
> could always render out the animated clips and sharpen *them*.
> Depending on the codec used, it's highly unlikely that you should
> notice any generation loss due to the *one* additional reencode.
> Unless you're using Cinepak or the likes.
>
> - RK
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
No comments:
Post a Comment