Re: [FCP-L] Re: Sharpening filter

On 19.10.2009, at 12:26, hllndc wrote:

> I'd like to avoid going into Apple Motion as it complicates things
> as I've tried 'Send To' from FCP to Motion and you need to re-do all
> the moves & presumably lose some precious resolution (and more
> focus)...

And no, there is NO resolution loss or the likes. Also, animating in
Motion is far superior and controllable, so that also doesn't in fact
pose any type of disadvantage. If push comes to shove, and you don't
care to learn the (I'm assuming) basics of animation in Motion, you
could always render out the animated clips and sharpen *them*.
Depending on the codec used, it's highly unlikely that you should
notice any generation loss due to the *one* additional reencode.
Unless you're using Cinepak or the likes.

- RK

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/