Posts
> "if it's going to TV, I surely wouldn't shoot progressive if I have
> the
> option"
> Given that I spend half my life defielding interlaced stuff for UK TV
> broadcasts I'd much rather the footage was shot progressive in the
> first
> place. It would save me throwing away half the vertical resolution.
Sorry, but that's just plain silly in my opinion. Deinterlacing for
subsequent broadcasting?? Especially after you admit yourself what
you're doing to the footage, you have actually come up with something
to justify it that makes some sort of sense? Since deinterlacing in
the context of TV bears ZERO advantage whatsoever (quite the opposite)
and no gain... well... other than a STUTTER that wasn't there before
of course. Hooray. It makes as much sense as interlacing progressive
footage, tho in that case there at least would be no actual LOSS.
I've heard this so often in the past with the utterly ridiculous
excuse "It looks like FILM!". Ouch. If I were to do that for any major
broadcaster here it would be rejected in seconds (and has been from
others). Quite understandably.
- RK
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
To learn more about the FinalCutPro-L group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-LYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FinalCutPro-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:FinalCutPro-L-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FinalCutPro-L-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FinalCutPro-L-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment